On Tuesday February 11, 2015, three Muslim American students were killed at the University of North Carolina around 5 p.m. by local man Craig Hicks. According to Hicks and his wife, this violent outburst was a result of an on going parking despite between Mr. Hicks and the victims, Yusor Mohammad Abu-Salha, 21; her husband, Mr. Barakat, 23; and her sister, Razan Mohammad Abu-Salha, 19. According to reports, Mr. Hicks opened fire on the victims and ultimately shot them in the head and killed them. This outrageous act of violence seems to be a bit too extreme to have erupted over a simple parking altercation. The timing is too peculiar. In my opinion, it seems to be more complicated than that.
Many people were quick to jump to twitter and Facebook to criticize the media for its lack of coverage, claiming that if a muslim man killed three christians, it would be breaking news. But instead, three Muslim Americans were killed, and the major media outlets took a backseat in regards to their coverage of this violent outbreak. I find it hard to believe that this violent action could have come about merely from a parking dispute, as Mr. Hicks and the media proclaim. It seems evident that this was a crime fueled from hatred and anger; a hate crime. People were quick to proclaim this as an act of terrorism, which seemed to shock many others in our society. Too often are the terms "terrorist" and "muslim" considered synonyms. But by definition, a hate crime is in fact an act of terrorism because it uses violence in the pursuit of political aims. Now Mr. Hicks may not look like our stereotypical terrorist we see on the news, but he must be judged by his actions, and his actions suggest a life of anger and ignorance towards an ideology.
As Americans, we are free to practice our religions and our cultures as we please, as guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments. We are all equal under the law: white, black, christian, or muslim; we are all equal.
Tuesday, February 17, 2015
Sunday, February 15, 2015
State v. Mann
During our mock trial today, we discussed the the appellate court case State v. Mann from 1829. The case was about property rights for slave owners and how they impact the slaves under their possession. In the case, a man by the name of John Mann rented out a slave by the name of Lydia from her slave owner, Elizabeth Jones. By signing a contract that leases out Lydia for a year, she becomes John Mann's property during that time period. During her period of servitude to Mr. Mann, Lydia attempted to escape. In response to this, Mr. Mann shoots Lydia in the back, wounding her. When the case entered the local court system, the court originally sided with Lydia and fined Mann $10 for assault and battery.
Mann appealed the decision to the appellate court system. This court, led by judge Thomas Ruffin, looked back on the case to see if due process and the case itself, was conducted correctly. The defense's argument stated that the local court system judge broke the law in North Carolina by siding with Lydia. According to North Carolina law, when a slave attempts to escape, the owner of said slave is within their rights to take physical action against the slave, which includes killing them. In 1829, the government could not side with Lydia because she is property of Mr. Mann, the defense argued. Thomas Ruffin ended up over turning the ruling from the local court, and sided with Mann. This decision served to further engrain the institution of slavery into the culture of, not just the south, but of North Carolina specifically.
Mann appealed the decision to the appellate court system. This court, led by judge Thomas Ruffin, looked back on the case to see if due process and the case itself, was conducted correctly. The defense's argument stated that the local court system judge broke the law in North Carolina by siding with Lydia. According to North Carolina law, when a slave attempts to escape, the owner of said slave is within their rights to take physical action against the slave, which includes killing them. In 1829, the government could not side with Lydia because she is property of Mr. Mann, the defense argued. Thomas Ruffin ended up over turning the ruling from the local court, and sided with Mann. This decision served to further engrain the institution of slavery into the culture of, not just the south, but of North Carolina specifically.Sunday, February 8, 2015
Brooklyn Performer's Due Process Rights Violated
Brooklyn subway performer, Andrew Kalleen, has filed a suit against the New York Police Department for violating his right to Due Process under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The NYPD arrested Kalleen under the claim that he needs a permit to perform along the subway transit stations. This is not the first incident where Kalleen has been confronted by the police, and by this time, he knew exactly what to say to the authorities. Kalleen referenced the Metropolitan Transportation Authority rules that allow performers to solicit donations and perform in transit stations as long as they are not impeding the flow of transit. But despite this, the NYDP continued with their arrest. This is a direct violation of Kalleen's Fifth Amendment and also his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process. These rights are put in place to protect the citizens of the United States from the abuse of power at the federal and state levels. The NYPD, a local, state-run organization, ignored the law and continued with the arrest and detainment of Kalleen without a just or reasonable cause. To read more about this issue, please feel free to continue reading the article at http://www.brooklyneagle.com/articles/2015/2/3/brooklyn-artist-set-sue-city-civil-rights-violationsWoman sues Michigan Police for First Amendment Violations
Malak Kazan, a 27 year old practicing Muslim woman from Michigan, was arrested last year for driving with a suspended license. When the time came to take her mug shot, she was told she must remove her hijab because it is the police departments policy to remove all headgear that "can contain concealable items that could pose a threat or chance of injury to the cops or to themselves." Ms. Kazan attempted to explain that it is against her religion to expose her hair and neck to men that are not in her immediate family. She even went far enough to request that a female officer take her mug shot, to avoid the offense to her own culture and belief system. Yet that request was refused because there "aren't always enough female officers on duty." So in the end, she was forced to remove the head piece and continue with the photograph.
Ms. Kazan is suing under the second clause of the first amendment and also the fourteenth amendment, granting her equal protection under the law, and protecting her from the dangers of excessive state and local authorities. Now I assume that this case will not take too long to decide, as it is a blatant violation of her guaranteed constitutional rights. The lawsuit also includes a plan to edit the policy of the police force to allow an exception for Muslim women and their religious headwear. To read more about this case, follow this link http://www.albawaba.com/editorchoice/woman-sues-michigan-cops-who-made-her-take-hijab-648412
Ms. Kazan is suing under the second clause of the first amendment and also the fourteenth amendment, granting her equal protection under the law, and protecting her from the dangers of excessive state and local authorities. Now I assume that this case will not take too long to decide, as it is a blatant violation of her guaranteed constitutional rights. The lawsuit also includes a plan to edit the policy of the police force to allow an exception for Muslim women and their religious headwear. To read more about this case, follow this link http://www.albawaba.com/editorchoice/woman-sues-michigan-cops-who-made-her-take-hijab-648412
Monday, February 2, 2015
American Sniper and a Hero's Controversy
The recently released film, "American Sniper", has stirred up a lot of controversy lately. By pulling in over $200 million dollars domestically in theaters, the story and legend of US Navy SEAL Chris Kyle has been brought to the forefront of all of our minds. And undoubtedly, the debate has been brought up, "Is this man a hero?" People like Jesse Ventura don't believe so. But he's not the only one. People everywhere are questioning the morality of Kyle's status as the most deadly sniper in US military history. People have seen the movie and his book as a way to brag about the number of people he's killed, or as a way to portray his racist feelings towards to muslim population in the Middle East. Yet on the contrary to those beliefs, there are still many people who view this man as a national hero. In Texas, Kyle's home state, there are even talks about making a "Chris Kyle Day", to honor the legendary sniper.
I personally see the man as a hero. Being from a military family, I of course have my biases. I tend to believe that anyone who can sacrifice their life for the protection of my freedoms deserves my respect. Chris Kyle was one of those "fundamentally American" people, where he wholeheartedly believed in the American dream and everything this country was founded upon. When asked about his kill count, he said he didn't think about it too much. What kept him up at night, though, was the thought that he couldn't save everyone: that he could have done more to save more American lives. The hatred and violence he saw in Iraq disturbed him to his very core. He realized that if hatred like that is allowed to breathe and grow without any action, it will undoubtedly reach our shores. If you would like to read more about Chris Kyle and his story, check out these websites: Chris Kyle, Former Nav SEAL, Dies at 38 and Jesse Ventura Says 'American Sniper' is No Hero
I personally see the man as a hero. Being from a military family, I of course have my biases. I tend to believe that anyone who can sacrifice their life for the protection of my freedoms deserves my respect. Chris Kyle was one of those "fundamentally American" people, where he wholeheartedly believed in the American dream and everything this country was founded upon. When asked about his kill count, he said he didn't think about it too much. What kept him up at night, though, was the thought that he couldn't save everyone: that he could have done more to save more American lives. The hatred and violence he saw in Iraq disturbed him to his very core. He realized that if hatred like that is allowed to breathe and grow without any action, it will undoubtedly reach our shores. If you would like to read more about Chris Kyle and his story, check out these websites: Chris Kyle, Former Nav SEAL, Dies at 38 and Jesse Ventura Says 'American Sniper' is No Hero
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



